Peer Review Policy

All research articles submitted to this journal undergo a double-anonymous (double-blind) peer review process and are evaluated by at least two independent reviewers whose expertise aligns with the submitted manuscript. The review process emphasizes thoughtful engagement, constructive feedback, and scholarly rigor to enhance the quality and contribution of each manuscript.

The final decision regarding acceptance or rejection is made by the Editor-in-Chief based on the reviewers’ evaluations and recommendations. All submissions are screened for plagiarism using Turnitin prior to acceptance.

Accepted articles are published online following the successful completion of the peer review and editorial process, ensuring transparency, academic integrity, and high publication standards.